The Cost of Protection: How Voters See Trump’s Trade Strategy

Tariffs are back at the centre of U.S. economic policies. Since January, the White House has layered a 10% “baseline” duty on most imports with steeper, target-specific rates, reinstated big-ticket lines like 50% on steel and aluminium and 25% on foreign-made cars and tightened small-parcel rules by stripping most de minimis exemptions. Legal fights, 90-day tariff pauses, and Trump’s deal-by-tweet revisions have kept businesses guessing, while brands from trainers to toys have signalled U.S. price rises and border delays have crept into supply chains. Against that backdrop, the polling shows a public open to tariffs in principle but concerned about the expectation that prices will go up. [\[1\]](/research/the-cost-of-protection-how-voters-see-trumps-trade-strategy)

# China tariffs: narrow approval meets intense resistance

On new duties for Chinese imports, approval sits at 48% (with 26% strongly and 22% somewhat), disapproval at 44% (with 27% strongly and 17% somewhat), and 8% don’t know. The coalition is as expected: Republicans are overwhelmingly onside, 48% strongly and 31% somewhat, while Democrats oppose in almost mirror image, with 52% strongly and 22% somewhat. Men lean pro-tariff, approving at 57% with just 5% unsure; women lean against at 39% approval and 11% unsure. By age, 18–24 are the most sceptical at 39% approve and 50% oppose. Among 65+, the same amount strongly disapproves as the 18–24 group (33%) but they are more polarised with 45% approving overall.

The split results could suggest that whilst voters understand the reasoning tariffs on China, voters seem to be expecting the bill to come out of their own pockets in the near future.

# What voters think tariffs do: prices first, jobs second

When the question shifts from policy to impact, price pass-through dominates. A 43% plurality says tariffs on Chinese goods will raise prices, only 21% say they will strengthen the economy, 24% say both, 5% neither and 7% don’t know. Women are more price sensitive than men with 46% (39% for men) expecting higher prices and only 15% saying the economy will strengthen. Republicans are the only major bloc where “strengthen” (38%) outpaces “raise prices” (22%).

That instinct tracks the year’s reality as international forecasters cut their 2025 growth outlooks after tariff escalations and customs slowdowns, plus pricier inputs have rippled through USMCA-era supply chains.

# EU tariffs: a perfect tie

Asked about higher tariffs on the European Union to counter trade imbalances, the electorate splits cleanly 44% support to 44% oppose, with 12% unsure. Once again, support among Republicans (strongly 39%, somewhat 34%) runs into hardened Democratic opposition (strongly 46%, somewhat 25%).

Compared with China, “strongly support” falls from 26% to 21% and uncertainty rises, especially among women and non-voters. Perhaps with allies and more familiar consumer brands, the security story carries less weight as the checkout price rises for US citizens.

# Mexico: leverage meets integration

Mexico is where voters try to have it both ways. Asked whether to maintain close trade ties or use tariffs to pressure Mexico on border security, the largest share, 38%, prefers keeping close ties, 20% favours using tariffs as pressure, 26% chooses both, 6% neither and 10% don’t know. Democrats are clearest for ties at 53%. Republicans split three ways, both at 31%, pressure at 30% and ties at 28%.

# Are tariffs effective or harmful?

When deciding whether tariffs are effective or harmful, the country edges pro-tariff while registering real concern. 46% call tariffs effective at protecting American jobs (with 22% very and 24% somewhat), 43% say they are harmful to U.S. businesses (with 23% very and 20% somewhat) and 10% don’t know. Republicans are emphatically positive (very 42%, somewhat 34%), Democrats emphatically negative (very 45%, somewhat 28%). Men are overwhelmingly more likely to say effective compared to women (35%) at 58% combined.

Should the U.S. reduce its trade deficit even if consumer costs rise?

When it comes to prioritising reducing the trade deficit at the cost of higher consumer prices, 44% either strongly or somewhat support that trade-off, 38% oppose it and 19% say they don’t know.

Men lean toward deficit reduction, with 55% supportive compared to 35% opposed. Women are nearly the reverse: only 34% back the idea, while 39% oppose and a striking 26% say they are unsure. Younger voters are more resistant to paying higher prices for deficit reduction. Among 18–24s, just 42% support and 39% oppose. By contrast, those aged 35–54 swing harder toward support, with approval rates in the mid-50s.

Trump voters overwhelmingly back prioritising the deficit, with 66% supportive and only 20% opposed. Harris voters are far more sceptical: only 26% support and 56% oppose.

Do Americans trust Trump to negotiate favourable trade deals?

On the question of whether President Trump is trusted to negotiate favourable trade agreements with partners like China, the EU and Mexico, 51% express trust (28% strongly, 23% somewhat), 42% distrust (28% strongly, 14% somewhat) and 8% don’t know.

Trump’s base remains firmly behind him: among Republicans, 83% express trust, with a remarkable 51% saying they strongly trust him. Democrats are the complete opposite, with 74% distrusting Trump.

Gender shapes the results in line with the earlier tariff questions. Men lean toward trust, with 61% backing Trump on trade negotiations. Women tilt against, with 54% distrusting him and just 41% expressing confidence. Older voters are particularly sceptical with those aged 55–64 and 65+ showing the strongest support for “strongly distrust” (35% and 34% respectively).

The results underscore Trump’s centrality to the trade debate. Even as tariffs are judged case-by-case on their targets and impacts, trust in Trump’s ability to secure deals looms large. His Republican base sees him as a shrewd negotiator leveraging U.S. power, whereas Democrats see erratic policy swings, costly consumer consequences and deal-by-tweet volatility.

The 2025 tariff debate shows an electorate divided, tariffs on China win narrow support as a stand against a rival but Europe splits the country evenly and Mexico exposes the tension between border leverage and supply chain stability.

Trump himself is the decisive factor. His base overwhelmingly trusts him to secure favourable deals, while Democrats remain firmly opposed and independents waver. Americans are not reflexive protectionists but pragmatic, backing tariffs when framed as job protection or national strength and pulling back when the household bill looks too high.

* * *

[\[1\]](/research/the-cost-of-protection-how-voters-see-trumps-trade-strategy) BBC News

Download the data tables for this poll.